QuadAC
10-12-2008, 11:06
Update:
The server is now up and running.
After talking to UK support on Monday, the server was scheduled to have its disks replaced, without much evidence that they were actually at fault. I was informed that I should perform a hardware diagnostic, which found out that the memory was actually at fault. Once this was replaced, and one more re-install performed, the server is up and stable.
Some observations:
Why wasn't I informed that I could do a hardware diagnostic last week, when talking to support?
Why are support unable to instigate this themselves? I had reported that the server was dead, multiple times, yet the only response was to re-install it - are the technicians in France incapable of initiating the hardware test themselves? I understand this is an unmanaged service, but they work 24/7 and kicking off a non-destructive hardware diagnostic on a dead server shouldn't be beyond their ken.
Why was there a mass of miscommunications between the UK and France, with me on the outside making what I thought were perfectly reasonable requests? The attitude of 'it lights up, so it's up to you to fix' on an allegedly brand-new server doesn't seem to be reasonable to me.
The server was ordered in English, was re-installed (multiple times) in English, and yet was installed in French with UI set to English, requiring the language to be changed post-install. Surely an English image should be installed in English from the get-go? A minor point but again points to some sloppiness in implementation.
Why wasn't the faulty memory detected when the server was commissioned? It took over a day for the server to be made available after purchase, why wasn't the hardware checked during this process? It only takes 20 minutes or so and would have saved everyone a lot of grief.
All of this has made my boss understandably wary of trusting OVH with anything critical, and also feels that it took the threat of a credit card chargeback before we received a decent level of support. However, I personally cannot fault the support we received this week; however the ball was dropped completely last week. We shall see how everything performs from now on, and we will be seeing what they come up with as compensation for this mess as per their SLA before committing to keep the server.
The server is now up and running.
After talking to UK support on Monday, the server was scheduled to have its disks replaced, without much evidence that they were actually at fault. I was informed that I should perform a hardware diagnostic, which found out that the memory was actually at fault. Once this was replaced, and one more re-install performed, the server is up and stable.
Some observations:
Why wasn't I informed that I could do a hardware diagnostic last week, when talking to support?
Why are support unable to instigate this themselves? I had reported that the server was dead, multiple times, yet the only response was to re-install it - are the technicians in France incapable of initiating the hardware test themselves? I understand this is an unmanaged service, but they work 24/7 and kicking off a non-destructive hardware diagnostic on a dead server shouldn't be beyond their ken.
Why was there a mass of miscommunications between the UK and France, with me on the outside making what I thought were perfectly reasonable requests? The attitude of 'it lights up, so it's up to you to fix' on an allegedly brand-new server doesn't seem to be reasonable to me.
The server was ordered in English, was re-installed (multiple times) in English, and yet was installed in French with UI set to English, requiring the language to be changed post-install. Surely an English image should be installed in English from the get-go? A minor point but again points to some sloppiness in implementation.
Why wasn't the faulty memory detected when the server was commissioned? It took over a day for the server to be made available after purchase, why wasn't the hardware checked during this process? It only takes 20 minutes or so and would have saved everyone a lot of grief.
All of this has made my boss understandably wary of trusting OVH with anything critical, and also feels that it took the threat of a credit card chargeback before we received a decent level of support. However, I personally cannot fault the support we received this week; however the ball was dropped completely last week. We shall see how everything performs from now on, and we will be seeing what they come up with as compensation for this mess as per their SLA before committing to keep the server.